The Tale of Kieu Essay - 275 Words

The Tale of Kieu (Essay Sample) Content: NameInstructorCourseDateThe Tale of KieuIntroductionOne can learn a lot from Kim-Van-Kieu due to the variety of things demonstrated in his work since many philosophically inspirational lessons are likely to be found. Nguyen-Du shows us how one can derive works of art, including poetry and music, and turn them into a masterpiece. Nguyen-Du, who was Vietnamese, would read poetic books from authors who were considered as legends and turn them into an even more outrageous and extraordinary works. Among other books, Nguyen-Du had read a popular Chinese novel called Le Cid that was written by Corneille and translated it into Vietnamese. Not only did he manage to retain its authenticity and intensity, but he took it to a whole new level of the rarest quality (Corneille, Pierre, and Wilbur 4). We also learn that the greatest form of art is inspired by pain, sorrow, and depression. Nguyen-Du wrote most of his inspirational works while serving a King he despised, afterwards he overthrew him, yet he hard all along served him together with his ancestors with utmost loyalty in a devoted manner. His philosophy was sound and this explains why his books were extraordinary despite his towards the regime.Nguyen-Dus writing skills were deeply engraved in poetry and figurative language. He almost did not describe anything literary but used a totally different choice of words. For example, he says a flower amongst those who wore red trousers meaning a jewel among rich girls (Corneille, Pierre, and Wilbur 5). Rich girls at the time wore red trousers as a symbol of wealth and good upbringing. He also gave accurate and precise descriptions of events, places, and individuals. For example, he describes the two sisters Thuy-Kieu and Thuy-Vin as two heavenly daughters slender as Apricot-trees, as pure as snow, and diverse in their perfection. We can notice here that he paid attention to details. Nguyen-Du also got some of his inspiration from music and visual art (Corneill e 13). This greatly influenced his writings that were capable of stimulating the deepest of emotions from the reader. He also knew how to select each word in his passage. In fact, he did it so well that no matter how scabrous his article was, he hardly offended the reader. Among a wide range of literary skills this one stood out the most. The difference between the Chinese articles he read and the Vietnamese version he wrote was that he gave the same stories in a most fascinating manner. He turned them into a masterpiece while relating with all Vietnamese respective of their age (Heinrich and Corneille 9).Le Cid is a French tragic comedy that was first performed in 1637 in Paris and ... The Tale of Kieu Essay - 275 Words The Tale of Kieu (Essay Sample) Content: NameInstructorCourseDateThe Tale of KieuIntroductionOne can learn a lot from Kim-Van-Kieu due to the variety of things demonstrated in his work since many philosophically inspirational lessons are likely to be found. Nguyen-Du shows us how one can derive works of art, including poetry and music, and turn them into a masterpiece. Nguyen-Du, who was Vietnamese, would read poetic books from authors who were considered as legends and turn them into an even more outrageous and extraordinary works. Among other books, Nguyen-Du had read a popular Chinese novel called Le Cid that was written by Corneille and translated it into Vietnamese. Not only did he manage to retain its authenticity and intensity, but he took it to a whole new level of the rarest quality (Corneille, Pierre, and Wilbur 4). We also learn that the greatest form of art is inspired by pain, sorrow, and depression. Nguyen-Du wrote most of his inspirational works while serving a King he despised, afterwards he overthrew him, yet he hard all along served him together with his ancestors with utmost loyalty in a devoted manner. His philosophy was sound and this explains why his books were extraordinary despite his towards the regime.Nguyen-Dus writing skills were deeply engraved in poetry and figurative language. He almost did not describe anything literary but used a totally different choice of words. For example, he says a flower amongst those who wore red trousers meaning a jewel among rich girls (Corneille, Pierre, and Wilbur 5). Rich girls at the time wore red trousers as a symbol of wealth and good upbringing. He also gave accurate and precise descriptions of events, places, and individuals. For example, he describes the two sisters Thuy-Kieu and Thuy-Vin as two heavenly daughters slender as Apricot-trees, as pure as snow, and diverse in their perfection. We can notice here that he paid attention to details. Nguyen-Du also got some of his inspiration from music and visual art (Corneill e 13). This greatly influenced his writings that were capable of stimulating the deepest of emotions from the reader. He also knew how to select each word in his passage. In fact, he did it so well that no matter how scabrous his article was, he hardly offended the reader. Among a wide range of literary skills this one stood out the most. The difference between the Chinese articles he read and the Vietnamese version he wrote was that he gave the same stories in a most fascinating manner. He turned them into a masterpiece while relating with all Vietnamese respective of their age (Heinrich and Corneille 9).Le Cid is a French tragic comedy that was first performed in 1637 in Paris and ...

The Simple Plurality System - Free Essay Example

In Brittan the Simple Plurality System (FPTP) is used for general elections. However, the need for an electoral reform has been argued and a referendum on changing the electoral system from First-Past-The-Post to the Alternative Vote will be held on any day before the end of October 2011. This essay will include the problems of First-Past-The-Post and will discuss whether the Alternative Vote would be fairer. First-Past-The-Post or the Single Plurality System is an electoral system in which a candidate only needs the plurality of votes to win i.e. more votes than any other candidate, and doesnt need an overall majority. That is why this system is sometimes called the winner-take-all-system. However, it is possible to win with an overall majority and when a party regularly does so in a specific constituency; the seat of that constituency is called a safe seat. Whereas, when a party wins with a small margin in a particular constituency, the seat would be called a margina l seat and that could be easily changed. The main argument against FPTP is that it is disproportional, i.e. the percentage share of the popular vote of parties does not reflect the percentage share of seats. This means that candidates can be elected on a small amount of public support. For instance, in 1997 Labour won 419 out of 659 seats, which is 63% of seats, although it only won 43% of the votes. In addition, it has been argued that this system promotes tactical voting, that is people voting against the party they dislike rather than for the party they support. As well as that, a common argument against FPTP is that it wastes a huge amount of votes, since votes of the losing candidates and the surplus votes of the winning candidates are counted for nothing. Also, people who are against FPTP claim that it limits the choice of voters, as they can only vote on a package of policies and if they are dissatisfied with some of the policies that the partys manifesto contains they can not express their opinions at the ballot box. Furthermore, it has been argued that FPTP dismays turnout, because many voters are reluctant to vote as they think their vote will not make a difference. This can be illustrated by the fact that turn out in European countries where PR and mixed systems are used is higher than in the UK. For these reasons many people want an electoral reform. The Liberal Democrats Party is the party, who included a pledge of a reform of the voting system. However, the Liberal Democrats wanted to change the system to the Single Transferable Vote system which is a PR system, but as a part of the coalition consensus with the Conservatives, they had to settle for the Alternative Vote. The AV is a majoritarian system, in which preferential voting is used. The referendum was supposed to be held on the 5th of May 2011, but the government lost by 195 votes to 199 on the 6th of December. Therefore, the referendum will be held anytime before the end of October 2 011. The main argument for the AV system is that it produces MPs, who have the majority support of the voters i.e. more than 50% of the vote. Moreover, it is argued that this system will lessen tactical voting, as voters can vote for the party they support no matter how small it is while knowing that their vote would still determine the winner. In addition, the division of constituencies under AV is the same as FPTP, so there would be no need for redrawing boundaries and each constituency will still have an MP who represents it. As well as that, supporter of AV believe that it excludes extremist parties which are unlikely to win second-preference votes. Whether or not the AV system is fairer than FPTP depends on individuals interpretation of fair. If fair is seen as more proportional, then some people argue that AV is a fairer system as they claim it is less disproportional than FPTP. Nonetheless, many people disagree and even believe that it could lead to a less proportional representation than FPTP and it is a winner takes all system as well. On the other hand, fair might be considered as a system in which the winner is more supported, in that sense, supporters of AV claim that it is fairer since the winner has more than 50% of the votes. Whereas, supporter of FPTP argue that FPTP produces a winner that is the voters first choice rather than their second or third preference. As already mentioned, AV is not the system that the Lib-Dems want; in fact Nick Clegg called it a miserable little compromise. Fiji, Australia and Papua New Guinea are the only three countries that use AV in their national general elections, and two of them are considering leaving it. Moreover, its argued that AV reduced the turnout in Australia, thats why they had to make voting mandatory. President of the no AV campaign Beckett, M (2010) said AV doesnt help democracy, it stands in its way, and I will be urging people to vote no next May. In conclusion, I think electoral ref orm is a decision that needs a lot of consideration. Therefore, it is not a good idea to change the voting system to one which wasnt even included in the manifestos of either coalition parties, to choose between two majoritarian systems, to select a system which is more complicated and maybe more disproportional than the current one. In my point of view, even if the country needs an electoral reform, it should consider a different system rather than AV.