What is This Divinity That Surrounds Us?

Should we embrace it or fear its intelligent public figure?In the poems, The Tyger by William Blake and Design by Robert Frost they marvel and fear this radiation diagram, ultimately leaving the reader with much questions than answers. Each poet portrays irony, figurative oral communication, resource, and intelligent design while trying to picture God and and his creations. Lets explore the similarities between each poets poem, first beginning with imagery.The office of this particular animal and insects provides a vivid in depth analysis. This appeals to the readers senses to tending them understand what the writer is trying to convey. Blakes statement, Burnt the fire of thine eyes, illustrates a sense of fear of the tiger. He wants to know by whom such a creature was created. Surely God would have not created something so feared.In the third stanza Blake asks, In what distant deep or skies. Deep in this sense we assume is world applied to the underworld. Frost states somet hing similar to this, What only when design of darkness to appall? The designer or immortal relegate must have bad intentions because he chafferms to be associated with some human body of darkness.The imagery both poets left in my mind was the use of disposition to illustrate there point. I could not help but to estimate the animals were a metaphor for humans. Some people live nice change intensity lives while others are are murders and rapists. How put up both sets of people come just about from one God who is purely full of good enoughness?They are want to attain if in some way Gods design is damage but how can that be coming from a divine existence? The imagery can be seen as frightful yet beautifully realistic, and the actors line used to describe the animals are simplistic and super business leaderful. Theres an emphasis on the animals power but at the same time this could be seen as Gods power being conveyed through this animal and insects.Ultimately, the vio lence and ferocity of the tiger and bird of passage are vivid, terrifying, and has a deep, dark undertone to them.Figurative language is used by both poets as well. According to Websters dictionary, figurative language is a language that uses words or expressions with a meaning that is different from the literal interpretation.We see examples of this all throughout both poems. Starting with Blakes poem, it reads Tyger Tyger burning bright in the forest of the night. Here the tiger is not actually boring, its more so used as a metaphor to demonstrate its ferociousness, or it can also be seen as the tigers appearance.The yellowness of its eyes mixed with its orangish fur in the night could remind one of fire. In design the word whitened is mentioned several times. This is unique because white is usually associated with good and purity, yet all throughout this poem it alludes to something dark and horror. Like a white piece of rigid satin cloth, the spider holds up the moth as in s ome sort of victory it has obtained.The spider who is seen as evil has now triumphed over the moth who is viewed as good. This ties back into that design is either flawed or has a dark side to it. Another place we see an example of this in the poem is when Frost states, On a white heal-all, holding up a moth. After doing some research I discovered a heal-all is actually blue in appearance and is know for its medicinal use.This demonstrates irony because the spider is preparing the moth for its death on something that is meant to heal. Later on in the poem, line ten, the heal-all is now blue. The wayside blue and innocent heal-all. ab initio the poet just describes the flower, here he proclaims its innocence, implying the flower had zip to do with it being white.Therefore this was the work of its designer. Figurative language as well as irony is seen throughout both poems as a way to overstatement and understand the poets outlook more vividly.Lastly, we come to intelligent design, which seems to be the general theme of both poets. Each questions Gods purpose from a Christians viewpoint.They ask a series of questions seeking to find or understand this divine design seen in nature. To the readers dismay though, the questions go unanswered. The questions are only presented, I hope it was left up to the reader to truly seek, in a philosophical way, the answers to the questions.The real philosophical question seems to be, Why? Did all these events happen by chance or did a difficult entity bring it all about? We get the sense from each poet that there is a higher being behind the spider and the tiger, be he deems to be far to complex for our understanding.In conclusion, I leave you with a quote from Hamlet that draws into what I feel both poets were fundamentally trying to get at. There is nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it so. Just possibly it is not our creator and his design who is flawed, but us from our outlook on nature that is flawed.